Legal Opinion

Burk v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1993No. 92-36, 92-37PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Justice.

This is a consolidated appeal from two separate bench trials in which appellant Ross Burk was found guilty of two counts of burglary and one count each of aggravated robbery, conspiracy to commit aggravated robbery, and conspiracy to commit burglary. Appellant raises issues concerning the voluntariness of inculpatory statements he made to police while in custody, the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction of conspiracy to commit aggravated robbery, the appropriateness of the sentences he received, the failure of one of the trial judges to disqualify himself…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. BlankSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
  2. Miller v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Madrid v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Witt v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Porth v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API