Legal Opinion

Application of Benjamin Gruskin, Deceased, by Irma Kelly Gruskin

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 20, 1956No. Patent Appeal 6205PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Acting Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the hold-' ing of the Primary Examiner rejecting, as unpatentable claims 4 through 6 and 8, 9, 10, 13, .and 14 of appellant’s application entitled “Dentifrice.”

The appealed claims relate to a denti-. frice composition containing a small amount of water-soluble chlorophyll and an inorganic salt of low solubility which has both an abrasive and an acid-neutralizing quality. It is brought out in the specification that many dental and oral illnesses occur .because of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Application of Philip A. Shaffer, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  2. Application of McKennaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  3. Application of BisleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
  4. In Re FridolphCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
  5. Application of LindbergCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Application of Milton E. Chandler and Alexander M. WrightCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  2. Bissell Inc. v. ER Wagner Manufacturing CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1962
  3. Application of Wallace A. Shelby, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API