Legal Opinion

In re Williams

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 15, 1955No. 6139PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the holding of the Primary Examiner rejecting, as unpatentable over the prior art, claim 20 of appellant’s application for a patent for “Individually Frozen Eggs and Process of Making the Same.”

Claim 20, the only claim on appeal, relates to a method of quick-freezing a whole egg, with its yolk intact, which has been removed from its shell. Broadly, the method consists of the steps of removing the egg from its shell and placing it in a flexible air-impermeable container, and freezing it.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re DelanceyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
  2. Application of DemarcheCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
  3. In re MillerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
  4. In Re LarkinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Application of Benjamin Gruskin, Deceased, by Irma Kelly GruskinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  2. Application of Nicholas Mostovych, James J. Weber, Walter A. Mitchell, Jr. And Paul L. AulbachCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
  3. Application of Fred Fortess and Werner A. P. SchoenebergCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  4. In re MarxCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  5. Matter of the Application of Karl F. MarxCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API