Legal Opinion

Application of Fred N. Hill

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 22, 1960No. Patent Appeal 6594PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WORLEY, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the Primary Examiner’s rejection of claims 1-5 and 7-12, all of the claims in appellant’s application for a patent entitled “Catalyst and Method for the Production of Ethylene Oxide” on the ground that the claims are unpatentable over certain prior art.

Claims 1, 7, and 12 are representative of the appealed claims and read:

“1. Process for preparing an active silver catalyst effective for the oxidation of ethylene to ethylene oxide which comprises forming an aqueous…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Application of BisleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
  2. In Re FridolphCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
  3. In re DelanceyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
  4. In re GoepfrichCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
  5. In re OakesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gentiluomo v. Runswick Bowling & Billiards Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  2. Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc. v. Kali Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2007
  3. Ingenus Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Nexus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API