Carpet Barn v. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GREENWOOD, Judge:
Appellants, The Carpet Barn, Kenneth MacQueen, and Haría MacQueen, appeal from a final judgment in their favor for “inverse condemnation” and severance damages, and from denial of their motion for' additur or, in the alternative, for a new trial. We reverse and remand.
In 1971, the MacQueens purchased the subject property at 3725 Redwood Road, in Salt Lake City. The MacQueens have operated a retail carpet and floor covering outlet, called “The Carpet Barn,” on the property since 1971. The property has 192 feet of frontage on the west side of Redwood Road. The State…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hansen v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 1988
- Ramon by and Through Ramon v. FarrUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- Bodon Ex Rel. Bodon v. SuhrmannUtah Supreme Court · 1958
- Halladay v. CluffCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987
- Utah State Road Commission v. MiyaUtah Supreme Court · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Utah Department of Transportation v. Admiral Beverage Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
- State v. DayCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
- State v. SherardCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
- Utah Department of Transportation v. 6200 South AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994