Utah State Road Commission v. Miya
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CALLISTER, Chief Justice:
Plaintiff initiated this action to acquire under the power of eminent domain the fee title to .66 acre of land of defendants for highway purposes. Defendants’ land is located within the city limits of Clearfield, Utah, and both parties agreed that its highest and best use was for residential purposes. Of the land taken .50 acre was subject to an easement for highway purposes ; in addition a .16 acre triangular shaped piece was acquired. Upon trial before a jury, defendants were awarded $750 for tue lana taxen and $8,000 severance damages. Plaintiff appeals and seeks…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pierpont Inn, Inc. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- State by State Road Commission v. Rozzelle Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1941
- Hampton v. State Ex Rel. Road CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1968
- State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. AllisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- In Re Housing Authority of City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1966
3Cited by20 opinions
- Colman v. Utah State Land BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1990
- Bott v. DeLandUtah Supreme Court · 1996
- Utah Department of Transportation v. Admiral Beverage Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2011
- La Plata Elec. Ass'n, Inc. v. CumminsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Flowers v. City of MorgantownWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.