Legal Opinion

Hansen v. Stewart

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1988No. 19383PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

Wilford and Vada Hansen brought a quiet title action to settle a boundary dispute with John and Alice Stewart. By stipulation, the only issue presented to the jury was the actual location of a certain corner partially defining the boundary separating the adjoining parcels of land. The jury found in favor of the Stewarts. The Han-sens unsuccessfully moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial and then appealed. They challenge various aspects of the way in which the case was tried and the denial of their post-trial motions. We affirm.

The Stewarts purchased a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Scharf v. BMG Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Franklin Financial v. New Empire Development Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Barson v. E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Price-Orem Investment Co. v. Rollins, Brown & Gunnell, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Von Hake v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Crookston v. Fire Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Billings v. Union Bankers Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Diversified Holdings, L.C. v. TurnerUtah Supreme Court · 2002

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API