Legal Opinion

Halladay v. Cluff

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided July 10, 1987No. 860079-CAPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before ORME, GARFF and JACKSON, JJ. ORME, Judge:

Halladays commenced this action to quiet title to a parcel of property sometimes referred to as the orange parcel. They relied on their holding actual legal title. Cluff counterclaimed seeking to quiet title to the orange parcel on the basis of boundary by acquiescence and, alternatively, seeking to quiet title to another parcel of property, sometimes referred to as the green parcel, if the court determined to adjudicate the rights of the parties with reference to legal titles rather than on the basis of boundary by acquiescence. The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mann v. Oppenheimer & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1986
  2. Halladay v. CluffUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Eliason v. WattsUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Hales v. FrakesUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Hein Enterprises, Ltd. v. San Francisco Real Estate InvestorsColorado Court of Appeals · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Valcarce v. FitzgeraldUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Buehner Block Co. v. UWC ASSOCIATESUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Nyrehn v. Industrial Com'n of UtahCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  4. Henderson v. For-Shor Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  5. Ford v. Showboat Operating Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API