Legal Opinion

Ramon by and Through Ramon v. Farr

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1989No. 20481PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

Plaintiffs Jose and Alicia Ramon, on behalf of their son, Jaime Ramon, appeal from a judgment rendered in a medical malpractice action upon a jury verdict in favor of defendant Dr. Boyd J. Farr. The Ramons claim that the trial court erred in refusing to give three jury instructions, including one that would have made the recommendations on a drug manufacturer’s package insert prima facie evidence of the applicable standard of care. We find no error in refusing the instructions and affirm.

Dr. Farr attended Alicia Ramon for prenatal care and during the delivery of Jaime at…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Salgo v. Leland Stanford Jr. University Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. Nixdorf v. HickenUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Getchell v. MansfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Ohligschlager v. Proctor Community HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Mulder v. Parke Davis & CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. HamiltonUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. JamesUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Craft v. PeeblesHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Ong International (U.S.A.) Inc. v. 11th Avenue Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. CarterUtah Supreme Court · 1995

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API