Legal Opinion
Fry v. Foster
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 16, 1937No. 27569PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBusbx, J.
This is an action by R. M. Fry, an alleged purchaser of the right to enter upon and cut and remove timber from a certain tract of land located in McCurtain county belonging to J. M. Asieren, a resident of Detroit, Mich. The plaintiff, Fry, is seeking an injunction to prevent the cutting and removal of the timber by Bon Foster, who claims the same under an alleged prior contract said to have been entered into between him 'and Askren through certain informal communications.
The action was commenced in the district court of McCurtain county on September 4, 1936. A temporary injunction was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Universal Products Co. v. EmersonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1935
- Wichita Falls & N. W. R. Co. v. Overstreet & DockterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Foster v. West Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Western Roofing Tile Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Pierce Petroleum Corp. v. HalesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Silver v. SlusherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Ollie v. RainboltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- East Central Oklahoma Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp. v. RussellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
- Suttle v. ChadwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.