Legal Opinion

Ollie v. Rainbolt

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 12, 1983No. 57939, 58231PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, Justice:

The issues presented for review are (1) Did the trial court err in granting summary disposition on the plaintiffs’ first three claims? (2) Did the trial court err in determining that the plaintiffs lacked standing to seek injunctive relief against violations of state branch banking laws? and (3) Did the trial court properly grant affirmative relief by directing the plaintiff-bank officers to transfer the stock in suit? We answer the first two questions in the affirmative and the last in the negative.

Central to this dispute is an attempt by a third-party purchaser [Rainbolt] to…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Atlantic Refining Co. v. Wyoming National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Guaclides v. KruseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  3. Gyurkey v. BablerIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Straley v. OsborneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  5. Anderson v. Armour & CompanySupreme Court of Kansas · 1970

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Mercury Investment Co. v. F.W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. Bartmann v. Maverick Tube Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  3. Lewis v. Sac & Fox Tribe of Oklahoma Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  4. First National Bank in Durant v. Honey Creek Entertainment Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  5. Unlimited Equipment Lines, Inc. v. Graphic Arts Centre, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API