Legal Opinion
Suttle v. Chadwell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 18, 1945No. 31867PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HURST, V. C. J.
This is an accounting suit, commenced by the plaintiff, A. Ben Chadwell, against the defendant, Chas. M. Suttle, and involving the construction of three projects at Pratt, Kan., under three contracts with the United States Government, referred to as the Army Air Base Contract, the Hangar Contract, and the Ordnance Contract. The plaintiff and defendant were partners in carrying out the contracts, operating under ‘the firm name of “Suttle & Chadwell, Ltd.” Harry Smith, project engineer for the partnership, intervened claiming as his compensation $125 per week plus 10 per cent of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sanders v. Pottlitzer Bros. Fruit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Western Roofing Tile Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Testerman v. BurtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Fry v. FosterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Hooven v. First Nat. Bank in ArdmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Howard v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Clements v. JungertIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
- Sarkeys v. HaasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. LittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- State Ex Rel. Henry v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.