Legal Opinion

Universal Products Co. v. Emerson

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided May 13, 1935No. 3; Writ of Error to the Superior Court for Sussex County, Action of Debt, No. 26PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harrington, J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

Under its assignments of error, Universal Products Company, the defendant below, the plaintiff in error, contends that the court below should be reversed:

1. Because it abused its legal discretion when it refused to set aside the verdict of the jury, and to grant a new trial in this case.

2. Because, at the trial,, it gave certain erroneous instructions to the jury.

3. Because, at the trial, it failed to give certain requested instructions to the jury.

In connection with the first contention made by it, the defendant below claims that the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Hartford Life Annuity Insurance v. UnsellSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Etting v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
  4. Mississippi & Dominion Steamship Co. v. SwiftSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1894
  5. Kelly v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1832

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Leeds v. First Allied Connecticut Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1986
  2. Anchor Motor Freight v. CiabattoniSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
  3. Chrysler Corp. v. QuimbySupreme Court of Delaware · 1958
  4. Sweetman v. Strescon Industries, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1978
  5. Loppert v. WindsorTech, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2004

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API