Legal Opinion
Pierce Petroleum Corp. v. Hales
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 23, 1930No. 19525PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REID, C.
These four cases had proceeded by separate pleadings until the day of the trial, when by consent of the parties and order of the court they were consolidated as being identical upon the issues, and we find they are. Each of the petitions alleged that, on March 6, 1925, the plaintiff entered into contract with the defendant, Pierce Petroleum Corporation, which acted through its Oklahoma manager and duly authorized agent, R. P. Kistler, for the sale of crude oil from a certain described tract of land situated in Carter county, Okla., for a term 'of one year from March 15, 1925; that the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Beckwith v. TalbotSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Drury v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1882
- Whitcomb v. OllerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Peabody v. . SpeyersNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Lee v. CherryTennessee Supreme Court · 1887
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- East Central Oklahoma Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- D. W. L., Inc. v. Goodner-Van Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp. v. RussellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
- Fry v. FosterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Alma Investment Corporation v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.