Legal Opinion
Carilli v. Pension Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 6, 1966PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKing, C. J.
This action of mandamus seeks to compel the defendant pension commission, hereinafter referred to as the commission, to award the plaintiff a special disability retirement allowance in accordance with the plaintiff’s claims as to the proper meaning and effect of subsection (f) of § 1 of No. 347 of the 1957 Special Acts, quoted in the footnote. The case has been beset by procedural difficulties. On January 7, 1964, in Carilli v. Hartford, 151 Conn. 703, 704, 197 A.2d 68, the attempted appeal by the plaintiff from the commission’s denial of his claim for a disability allowance was dismissed for…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. MuoloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Briganti v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- State v. DoeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Warner v. GabbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Emerick v. Monaco & Sons Motor Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kellems v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Adams v. RubinowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Lublin v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Citerella v. United Illuminating Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Wilson v. Connecticut Product Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.