Legal Opinion
Lublin v. Brown
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 25, 1975PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHouse, C. J.
The plaintiff brought this action seeking a declaratory judgment that §§ 30 and 31 of Public Act No. 223 enacted by the 1972 session of the General Assembly are unconstitutional, null, void and unenforceable and a refund of all monies collected by the defendant pursuant to the provisions of those sections. Section 31 of the act is simply a repealer of an earlier statute and the plaintiff’s attack is entirely directed to the provisions of § 30 which is now printed as § 51-81b of the General Statutes entitled “Occupational tax on attorneys.”
Public notice of the pendency of the action was…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Allied Stores of Ohio, Inc. v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Horton v. MeskillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Zapata v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Heslin v. Connecticut Law Clinic of Trantolo & TrantoloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Roundhouse Construction Corporation v. Telesco Masons Supplies Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- State v. BretonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.