Legal Opinion
State v. Doe
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 6, 1962PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, C. J.
This action has been reserved for the advice of this court upon facts agreed upon and set forth hereinafter. At the request of the parties, the trial court allowed the defendant to use a fieti*218tions name and the cause to be docketed as State of Connecticut v. Jane Doe. See General Statutes § 52-89; Practice Book § 199; Buxton v. Ullman, 147 Conn. 48, 59, 156 A.2d 508.
The defendant came from Rutland, Vermont, to Hartford, Connecticut, in January, 1961. Her parents reside in Rutland. From the time of her birth on September 14, 1939, until she came to Hartford, she had never resided in this…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Alabama State Federation of Labor v. McAdorySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Edwards v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- New York v. O'NEILLSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- State v. SulSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- State ex rel. Higgins v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. ColonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- United States Steel Corp. v. Multistate Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- In Re ElliottWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Roundhouse Construction Corp. v. Telesco Masons Supplies Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Collins v. YorkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.