Legal Opinion

Davidson v. Eastern Fire & Casualty Insurance

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 16, 1965No. 18324PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lionel K. Legge, Acting Justice.

Stated in general terms, the issue here is as follows: Where, as the result of a collision between an uninsured motor vehicle and an automobile driven by one not its o,wner, a guest passenger not the spouse or relative of such driver or spouse is injured, is such passenger entitled, as an “insured” within the intent of Sections 46-750.11, 46-750.13 and 46-750.14 of the 1962 Code of Laws, to uninsured mo.torist coverage under a policy of automobile liability insurance issued to such driver on his own car ?

On March 18, 1962, the plaintiff Elma Davidson was a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Laird v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  2. Vernon v. Harleysville Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  3. Hatchett v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  4. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance v. FultonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  5. Glens Falls Insurance v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Indiana Insurance v. Noble Ex Rel. JordanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Auto Owners Insurance v. RollisonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  3. Hogan v. Home Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
  4. Garris v. Cincinnati InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  5. Unisun Insurance v. SchmidtSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API