Unisun Insurance v. Schmidt
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BURNETT, Justice:
This case presents a novel set of facts requiring us to interpret the definitions of “insured” and “uninsured motor vehicle” in South Carolina’s motor vehicle insurance statute. S.C.Code Ann. § 38-77-30 (Supp.1998). The Court of Appeals held petitioner was not an “insured” under the statute. We reverse.
FACTS
The parties stipulated to the following facts:
January O’Neale’s father gave her a BMW with strict instructions not to let anyone else drive the car. On the night of November 27, 1992, Miss O’Neale and her friend Jennifer Hurst went to a party at Christopher Schmidt’s house.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kiriakides v. United Artists Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. NissenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Hogan v. Home Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Harleysville Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1962
- Gunnels v. American Liberty InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Schultz v. Illinois Farmers InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. SweatSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
- Auto Owners Insurance v. RollisonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- Town of Mt. Pleasant v. RobertsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- Bass v. IsochemCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.