Legal Opinion

Unisun Insurance v. Schmidt

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 13, 2000No. 25084PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Justice:

This case presents a novel set of facts requiring us to interpret the definitions of “insured” and “uninsured motor vehicle” in South Carolina’s motor vehicle insurance statute. S.C.Code Ann. § 38-77-30 (Supp.1998). The Court of Appeals held petitioner was not an “insured” under the statute. We reverse.

FACTS

The parties stipulated to the following facts:

January O’Neale’s father gave her a BMW with strict instructions not to let anyone else drive the car. On the night of November 27, 1992, Miss O’Neale and her friend Jennifer Hurst went to a party at Christopher Schmidt’s house.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kiriakides v. United Artists Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. NissenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  3. Hogan v. Home Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
  4. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Harleysville Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1962
  5. Gunnels v. American Liberty InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Schultz v. Illinois Farmers InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. SweatSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  3. Auto Owners Insurance v. RollisonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  4. Town of Mt. Pleasant v. RobertsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  5. Bass v. IsochemCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API