Legal Opinion

Glens Falls Insurance v. City of Columbia

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 10, 1963No. 18052PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, Justice.

Separate actions were instituted by the plaintiffs Glens Falls Insurance Company and South Carolina Insurance Company against the defendant City of Columbia to re*239cover certain sums paid under protest for municipal business licenses. The complaints and answers are identical in all material respects, except as to the amount involved in each case. The basic issue in both actions involves a determination of the right of the City of Columbia under its ordinances and the State statutes to impose an annual business license tax upon the plaintiffs in excess of $2,500.00 each. This…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carroll v. Town of YorkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
  2. ELLIOTT v. SlighSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
  3. Wagener v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
  4. Forde v. Owens, MayorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  5. City of Columbia v. PutnamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tinker Investment & Mortgage Corp. v. City of Midwest CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  2. Davidson v. Eastern Fire & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  3. State Ex Rel. Medlock v. South Carolina State Family Farm Development AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
  5. City of Columbia v. Glens Falls InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API