Legal Opinion

United Mutual Savings Bank v. Riebli

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1960No. 34880PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOtt, J.

October 30,1954, the Washington Building Company leased “that certain store space known as 1025 Pacific Avenue,” in Tacoma, Washington, to Donald H. Hutch-ins for an ice cream and soda fountain business. November 30, 1955, the lease was assigned to Arthur A. Riebli and George Hoertrich, Jr., with the consent of the building company. During the weekend prior to October 29, 1956, *819a water pipe imbedded in the cementlike floor of the leased premises ruptured. Monday morning at 7:30 a. m., the maintenance superintendent of the building company discovered that the basement of the building had been…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hogland v. KleinWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Morner v. Union Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Lynch v. Ninemire Packing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Kind v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Filley v. ChristopherWashington Supreme Court · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ewer v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1971
  2. Tinder v. Nordstrom, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  3. Washington Hydroculture, Inc. v. PayneWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Washington Hydroculture, Inc. v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  5. United Mutual Savings Bank v. RiebliWashington Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API