Legal Opinion

Hogland v. Klein

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1956No. 33462PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.

This appeal involves an action by the plaintiff to recover the contract price for moving a building and a counterclaim by the defendants for damages to the building, occurring during the moving operations.

The plaintiff, Everett A. Hogland, d/b/a Hogland Transfer Company, orally agreed with defendants to move a certain building (owned by defendants) from the Arlington, Washington airport to the defendants’ farm. Plaintiff agreed to furnish the timber, dollies, and other equipment necessary to be used in preparing the building for moving for the sum of twenty-five dollars per day. It was agreed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Oldis v. La Societe Francaise De Bienfaisance MutuelleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. Mahlum v. Seattle School District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Taylor v. Reading Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1949

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Labriola v. Pollard Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Labriola v. Pollard Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Zukowsky v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Kloss v. Honeywell, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  5. Bernsen v. Big Bend Electric Cooperative, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1993

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API