Washington Hydroculture, Inc. v. Payne
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.
Lessor, Washington Hydroculture, Inc., brought a damage action against lessee, Frank Payne, for the cost of rebuilding two leased fiberglass greenhouses destroyed by fire. Summary judgment on liability was granted against lessee based on a provision in the lease commonly called a maintenance and delivery clause. There is no issue of fault, as this is an action on the contract.
The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court. Washington Hydroculture, Inc. v. Payne, 26 Wn. App. 40, 610 P.2d 967 (1980). We reverse.
In 1975, Frank Payne leased two hydroponic greenhouses located on lessor's property…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Realty & Rebuilding Co. v. ReaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Wattles v. South Omaha Ice & Coal Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Puget Investment Co. v. WenckWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- Anderson v. FergusonWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Armstrong v. MaybeeWashington Supreme Court · 1897
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Tiegs v. WattsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Tiegs v. WattsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Cascade Trailer Court v. BeesonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
- Seattle-First National Bank v. Westlake Park AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
- Mead v. Park Place PropertiesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.