Legal Opinion

Morner v. Union Pacific Railroad

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 1948No. 30508PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

— Plaintiffs brought separate actions against defendants to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from a collision between an automobile in which plaintiffs were riding as passengers and a truck owned by defendants Fiorito and driven by their employee, defendant Jesse Helton. The collision occurred at a point on a highway where, at the time, both motor vehicles were temporarily enveloped in a cloud of steam which had been emitted by a railroad locomotive owned and operated by defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company and traveling on a track adjacent to the highway.

The two actions…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. D'Amico v. ConguistaWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Olson v. Whitthorne & SwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Walters v. Seattle, Renton & Southern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Anderson v. McCarthy Dry Goods Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Lamb v. Old Colony RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Chase v. BeardWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Zukowsky v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Horner v. Northern Pacific Beneficial Ass'n Hospitals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Ball v. MudgeWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Pacheco v. AmesWashington Supreme Court · 2003

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API