Ewer v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtMunson, C. J.
Plaintiff, Ronald L. Ewer, brought suit for damages suffered when a tractor tire he was mounting exploded. The jury found for plaintiff and appropriate judgment was entered. Defendant manufacturer, Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, appealed.
The exploding tire — a new Goodyear 1324, 4-ply nylon' replacement tire — was purchased from defendant’s' distributor by plaintiff’s employer in the fall of 1966. The tire was stored in the employer’s enclosed warehouse until removed by plaintiff on the day of the accident. The number “13” designates the width (13 inches) from one sidewall to the other,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Jesionowski v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Zentz v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
- Comstock v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
- Pederson v. DumouchelWashington Supreme Court · 1967
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Lockwood v. a C & S, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
- Davis v. Globe MacHine Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1984
- Cassisi v. Maytag Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Miller v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- Haysom v. Coleman Lantern Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.