Motorists Mutual Insurance v. Andrews
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCacioppo, J.
The question presented to this court is whether underinsured motorist coverage is available to an insured where the tortfeasor’s policy limit is greater than the insured’s policy limits but the claims of multiple claimants have resulted in undercompensation of the insured’s injuries. For the reasons which follow, we hold that underinsured motorist coverage is available, and affirm the court of appeals.
The central dispute in the case at bar is whether the accident involved an underinsured motorist within the meaning of R.C. 3937.18(A)(2). Motorists asserts that Mac’s Transport was not…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wood v. ShepardOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- James v. Michigan Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Hill v. Allstate InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Auto-Owners Mutual Insurance v. LewisOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Zelko v. ParsonsOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Savoie v. Grange Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Clark v. ScarpelliOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Corr v. American Family InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Blue Cross v. HrenkoOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Lakes v. Grange Mutual Casualty Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2012
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.