Legal Opinion

Blue Cross v. Hrenko

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1995No. 93-2459PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

The question presented to this court is whether, pursuant to the terms of the health insurance policy, Blue Cross is entitled to be reimbursed by Hrenko after Hrenko received compensation by way of settlement from Allstate.

For the reasons that follow, we hold that pursuant to the terms of an insurance contract, a health insurer that has paid medical benefits to its insured and has been subrogated to the rights of its insured may recover from the insured after the insured receives full compensation by way of a settlement with the insured’s uninsured motorist carrier.

I

In Ohio, there are three…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burris v. Grange Mutual CompaniesOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Motorists Mutual Insurance v. AndrewsOhio Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Hare v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance v. ChristianOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Northern Buckeye Education Council Group Health Benefits Plan v. LawsonOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Roberts v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. French v. Frey (In Re Bergman)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API