Legal Opinion

Auto-Owners Mutual Insurance v. Lewis

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1984No. 83-1202PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCelebrezze, C.J.

The appeal presents three issues for our review. The first is whether the terms of the automobile insurance policy under consideration permit stacking of uninsured motorist coverages. The second issue is whether the medical expense coverage may be stacked. Finally, we are faced with the issue of whether appellant, in his individual and representative capacity, is entitled to the full amount of the applicable coverage in each capacity.

I

The law regarding uninsured motorist coverage has undergone extensive treatment in the past several years. In fact, the issue of whether uninsured motorist…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Whitehead v. General Telephone Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Karabin v. State Automobile Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Ady v. West American InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Kish v. Central National Insurance GroupOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Sexton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Dues v. HodgeOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Schaefer v. Allstate InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Gomolka v. State Automobile Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Motorists Mutual Insurance v. AndrewsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Frank v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API