Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Cassinelli

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1950No. 3579PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Badt, J.:

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company has appealed from a judgment in favor of Pete Cassinelli, Jr., its insured, under an insurance policy indemnifying him against public liability and property damage. It has also appealed from the order denying a new trial. The appeal raises two questions, both of which were decided adversely to appellant by the trial court. The first is that the nature of the loss involved was not covered by the terms of the policy. The second is that the respondent is precluded from recovery by reason of his failure to give certain…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Dezell v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  2. Young v. Travelers Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  3. Hope Spoke Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  4. Phoenix Cotton Oil Co. v. Royal Indemnity Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Houran, Admr. v. Preferred Acc. Ins. Co. of N.Y.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1938

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Alcazar v. HayesTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Tiedtke v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New YorkSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
  3. Henderson v. Hawkeye-Security Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  4. Viani v. Aetna Insurance CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Wolverine Insurance v. SorroughCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API