New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Hamblen
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hickman
This suit was instituted by the executors of the estate of H. C. House, deceased, on an indemnity contract to recover the amount expended by the deceased in defense of a suit which, they allege, should have been defended by petitioner under the terms of the indemnity contract. Judgment was rendered in favor of the executors by the trial court and that judgment was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals. 186 S. W. (2d) 741.
The indemnity contract was designated “owners/ landlords’, and tenants’ public liability policy.” It covered a building owned by the deceased, House, and occupied and used…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Knight v. Chicago Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1945
- Houran, Admr. v. Preferred Acc. Ins. Co. of N.Y.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1938
- Utilities Ins. Co. v. MontgomeryTexas Commission of Appeals · 1940
- Texas Glass & Paint Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Hoffman v. Employer's Liability Assurance Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Shields Ltd. Partnership v. BradberryTexas Supreme Court · 2017
- Massachusetts Bond. & Ins. Co. v. Orkin Exterm. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1967
- Klein v. Century LloydsTexas Supreme Court · 1955
- Members Mutual Insurance Company v. CutaiaTexas Supreme Court · 1972
- Weaver v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1978
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.