Legal Opinion
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided June 20, 1957No. 33431PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.
Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, hereinafter referred to as Hartford, is a Connecticut corporation, and, in the course of its business, issues public liability policies.
Sears, Roebuck and Co., a New York corporation, hereinafter referred to as Sears, operates a downtown retail store in Seattle, fronting on Utah street.
Sears maintains parking lots in the immediate area for the use of its customers, including a large lot immediately east of and across Utah street from its store building. Sur rounding this particular lot is a concrete sidewalk owned by the city. Sears has blacktopped…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Houran, Admr. v. Preferred Acc. Ins. Co. of N.Y.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1938
- Evans v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1946
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CassinelliNevada Supreme Court · 1950
- Vanderbilt v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
- Jeffries v. General Casualty Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1955
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. WiscombWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Oregon Automobile Insurance v. SalzbergWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Graham v. Public Employees Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. USF InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Viani v. Aetna Insurance CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.