Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Castle v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 9, 2000No. 90-1291 CPublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WIESE, Judge.

Part I

• The Timeliness of the FDIC’s Intervention ..................................... 193

• The FDIC’s Standing to Intervene............................................. 195

i. The Receivership Deficit................................................. 198

• Shareholder-Plaintiffs’ Right to Seek Lost Profits................................ 199

Part II

• Expectation Interest......................................................... 200

i. Causation.............................................................. 200

ii.…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Castle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  2. Franconia Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  3. Castle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  4. Westfed Holdings, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  5. Fifth Third Bank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API