Legal Opinion

Davis v. Davis

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 28, 1962No. 96PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.

Defendant, by demurrer to the reply, challenges the sufficiency of the facts alleged to invalidate the release admittedly executed. The release, by its terms, releases and discharges the defendant from all claims and demands arising out of the collision referred to in the complaint. The reply in substance alleges the insurance agent who took the release misrepresented its contents, assuring plaintiff that it related only to her medical and hospital bill, enabling her to obtain funds for the payment of these items; she was told the doctor was demanding his money; she had no means to pay and…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ward v. . HealthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. Harding v. Southern Loan & InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Ward v. HeathSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. Early v. EleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. Colt v. . KimballSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Casey v. ProctorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Marriott Financial Services, Inc. v. Capitol Funds, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. Robert Del Raso v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  4. Winant v. BosticCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  5. Chandler v. Aero Mayflower Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API