Swinton v. Savoy Realty Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, C. J.
The defendants noted numerous exceptions during the trial, but base their appeal chiefly on three grounds: (1) the denial of their motion for judgment of nonsuit, (2) submission of issue of punitive damages, and (3) errors in the court’s instructions to the jury.
1. It is apparent from an examination of the record that the plaintiffs’ evidence considered in the light most favorable for them was sufficient to make out a ease for the jury. The plaintiffs are aged Negroes without education, and their testimony, if believed, was adequate to establish actionable fraud. Garland v. Penegar, 235 N.C.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Saberton v. GreenwaldOhio Supreme Court · 1946
- Baker v. WinslowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Harding v. Southern Loan & InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Baker v. . WinslowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Hargett v. . LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Newton v. Standard Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Oestreicher v. American National Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Hardy v. TolerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Helen C. Carras and Bill G. Carras, Co-Executors of the Estate of Gus N. Carras, Deceased v. James S. Burns, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
- Hinson v. DawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.