Legal Opinion

Ward v. Heath

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 8, 1943PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

If tbe release is valid it is an effective bar and plaintiff may not proceed on either cause of action. Hence, we may pass tbe question of tb'e sufficiency of tbe evidence on tbe issue of negligence without decision and come directly to tbe vital and decisive questions presented. (1) Has plaintiff offered any evidence tending to show that she was induced to sign tbe release by tbe fraud of tbe defendants; and (2) if so, has she by her conduct, notwithstanding tbe fraud, ratified tbe same?

A release executed by tbe injured party and based on a valuable consideration is a complete defense to an…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. American United Mutual Life Insurance v. City of Avon ParkSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Cooper v. SchlesingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Whitehurst v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  4. Colt v. . KimballSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Planters Bank & Trust Co. v. YelvertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Ragsdale v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Hardy v. TolerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. Myers & Chapman v. Thomas G. EvansSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  4. Vail v. VailSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Robert Del Raso v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API