Legal Opinion

Harding v. Southern Loan & Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 18, 1940PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEaRNhill, J.

The corporate plaintiff seeks and was awarded no relief. It is a necessary party only by reason of the prayer for relief by defendants who seek a foreclosure of the mortgage upon the real property belonging to the corporation. The appeal of the individual plaintiff must turn necessarily upon the disposition made of defendants’ appeal. Therefore, the question he seeks to present for decision requires no discussion.

On 8 October, 1938, plaintiff, an experienced hotel man, went to Edenton and inspected the real property known as the Joseph Hewes Hotel owned by the corporation, the capital stock…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. May v. . LoomisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Cash Register Co. v. . TownsendSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. Leggett Electric Co. v. MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Peyton v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  5. Williamson v. . HoltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Olivetti Corp. v. Ames Business Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Johnson v. OwensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Calloway v. WyattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Overstreet v. Brookland, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Rosenthal v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API