Morsman v. City of Madras
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.
The City of Madras passed an ordinance annexing some contiguous territory. Petitioners, who own a trailer park in the annexed area, appealed the annexation to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA), alleging, among other things, that the annexation did not meet the “reasonableness” requirement imposed by earlier cases from this court and the Supreme Court. Petitioners also alleged that the annexation was void because the city failed to demonstrate that the annexation complied with state and local land use planning criteria. LUBA rejected petitioners’ reasonableness argument but agreed that the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Portland General Electric Co. v. City of EstacadaOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- Marion County Fire District 1 v. Marion-Polk County Boundary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- Kampstra v. Salem Heights Water DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1964
- Rivergate Residents Ass'n v. Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Defense of Animals v. Oregon Health Sciences UniversityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Morsman v. City of MadrasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Morsman v. City of MadrasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Citizens Against Annexation v. Lane County Local Government Boundary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010