Legal Opinion

Kampstra v. Salem Heights Water District

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1964PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.

Salem Heights Water District, a domestic water-supply corporation, appeals from a decree which enjoined it from charging plaintiffs the pro-rata cost of a certain water main as a condition precedent to the furnishing of water service.

- The plaintiffs .own commercial property outside the city limits of Salem, Oregon, and within the boundaries of the suburban water district. Their property extends from the southeast corner of the intersection of Hilfikér Street and Highway 99-East south some 300 feet along the east side of the highway. Just prior to the eruption of this controversy, a ten-inch…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Paulsen v. PortlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Paulson v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Portland General Electric Co. v. City of EstacadaOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Kliks v. Dalles CityOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Rogers v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Finks v. Maine State Highway CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  2. Piazza v. Clackamas Water DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  3. Morsman v. City of MadrasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. Oliver v. HyleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  5. Valenti v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API