Legal Opinion
Rivergate Residents Ass'n v. Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided October 10, 1984No. 1930; CA A29383PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.
Petitioner seeks review of a final order of the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission (Commission) approving the proposed annexation of certain unpopulated territory contiguous to its members’ property. It contends that, because the approved proposal deliberately creates an “island” of its members’ property, thereby subjecting it to summary annexation pursuant to ORS 222.750, 1 it is unreasonable and deprives the members of their constitutional right to vote on annexation. It also contends that the Commission failed adequately to consider the members’ interests in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gomillion v. LightfootSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Carrington v. RashSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Alabama State Federation of Labor v. McAdorySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- State Ex Rel. Heinig v. City of MilwaukieOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Oregon Newspaper Publishers Ass'n v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mid-County Future Alternatives Committee v. Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Morsman v. City of MadrasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- Costco Wholesale Corp. v. City of BeavertonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Department of Land Conservation & Development v. City of St. HelensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Aloha Incorporation Advisory Committee v. Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.