Morsman v. City of Madras
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.
Petitioners seek review of a decision of the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) that pertains to respondent City of Madras’s annexation of 759 acres of land. Before LUBA, petitioners argued that the “triple majority” method of annexation that the city employed pursuant to ORS 222.170(1) is unconstitutional under Article I, section 20, of the Oregon Constitution, 1 and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. LUBA rejected petitioners’ constitutional challenges to the statute, and we affirm.
This is the third time that this dispute has been before…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Kramer v. Union Free School District No. 15Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Cipriano v. City of HoumaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Huddleston v. SawyerOregon Supreme Court · 1997
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Colby v. GunsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- City of Corvallis v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- White v. ReyesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
- De Young v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.