Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Morin v. Rosenthal

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 15, 2004No. B166408PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JOHNSON, Acting P. J .

Defendants appeal from an order denying their SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) motions as untimely and awarding sanctions to the plaintiff. The court rejected defendants’ argument they could not have filed the SLAPP motions any sooner because they had a motion pending to transfer the case from the superior court’s west district to its central district. We affirm the portion of the order denying the SLAPP motions. We reverse the portion of the order awarding sanctions and remand the matter to the trial court for a sanctions determination in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Barquis v. Merchants Collection Assn.California Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Wilcox v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. In Re JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Neet v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. South Sutter, LLC v. Lj Sutter Partners, L.PCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Platypus Wear, Inc. v. GoldbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Olsen v. HarbisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Oracle Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Nunez v. PennisiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API