Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Platypus Wear, Inc. v. Goldberg

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 5, 2008No. D050305PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

AARON, J.

I

INTRODUCTION

In October 2004, Platypus Wear, Inc., PW Industries, Inc. (collectively Platypus), Alexandra Ponce de Leon, and Sylvia Offner Caira, filed a complaint against Luce Forward Hamilton & Scripps, and two of its attorneys, Kevin A. Cahill and Timothy R. Pestotnik (collectively Luce Forward), Baker & McKenzie, and two of its attorneys, Charles H. Dick and Peter W. Ito, Laurens Offner (Laurens), and Martin Goldberg. Among other claims, Platypus alleged that Goldberg had acted illegitimately as Platypus’s chief financial officer, and that he assisted Laurens in taking a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  2. People v. SimonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Mann v. Quality Old Time Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Lafayette Morehouse, Inc. v. Chronicle Publishing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. Olsen v. HarbisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Baral v. SchnittCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Wallace v. McCubbinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Newport Harbor Ventures, LLC v. Morris Cerullo World EvangelismCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Newport Harbor Ventures, LLC v. Morris Cerullo World EvangelismCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Calvo Fisher & Jacob LLP v. LujanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API