Legal Opinion

Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Oracle Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 27, 2015No. H039507PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RUSHING, P. J.

Plaintiff Hewlett-Packard Company (HP) brought this action against Oracle Corporation (Oracle) alleging that Oracle breached contractual and other duties by announcing that it would no longer make its software products compatible with certain HP hardware products. After the trial court found in a bifurcated trial that Oracle was indeed obligated to adapt its products to the HP systems, and on the very eve of a trial on the questions of breach and remedy, Oracle brought a motion under the antiSLAPP statute, Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 (§ 425.16), challenging one…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Varian Medical Systems, Inc. v. DelfinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. City of Sacramento v. DrewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. Martinez v. Metabolife International., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. Simpson Strong-Tie Co., Inc. v. GoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Newport Harbor Ventures, LLC v. Morris Cerullo World EvangelismCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Newport Harbor Ventures, LLC v. Morris Cerullo World EvangelismCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Central Valley Hospitalists v. Dignity Health, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. Yeager v. Holt, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. Sprengel v. ZbylutCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API