Legal Opinion

In Re Jordan

California Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1992No. S025000PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEORGE, J.

—This case presents the question whether the “prison-delivery” rule remains viable in California. The rule provides that a prisoner’s notice of appeal is deemed timely filed if delivered to prison authorities within the 60-day filing period set forth in rule 31(a) of the California Rules of Court. (See People v. Lepe (1987) 195 Cal.App.3d 1347,1349, fn. 2 [241 Cal.Rptr. 388]; People v. Wychocki (1987) 188 Cal.App.3d 1063, 1065 [233 Cal.Rptr. 830].) A recent Court of Appeal decision has held, however, that the prison-delivery rule no longer is applicable in California, instead…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. In Re SwainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Cochran v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Haag v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  5. People v. SlobodionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Oloth Insyxiengmay v. Richard MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. People v. MendezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. In Re ChavezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Silverbrand v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Causey v. CainCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API