Legal Opinion
United States v. Martorelli
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided November 4, 1924No. 2390; No. 2397PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge
The importation in this case was figs, dried and pressed. The figs were packed in baskets. There were 8 large baskets, each containing 60 smaller baskets of figs of 1 kilo each, 20 large baskets each containing 6 small baskets of about 10 kilos each, and 6 baskets of 30 kilos each. The sample basket of figs introduced in evidence showed the figs to be covered with glazed paper within the basket, the basket being made of woven wood strips and with a cover of the same material.
Neither the figs nor the baskets were marked with the name of the country of origin,.when imported, as required by…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- American Bead Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
- Junge v. HeddenSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Bradford Co. v. American Lithographic Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- Vitelli v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
- United States v. SuzarteCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Burstein & Sussman v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- Sussman v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- Yohalem v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- United States v. American Sponge & Chamois Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- Di Martino v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.