Legal Opinion

Yohalem v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 1, 1926No. 2680PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

Section 304 (a) of the Tariff Act of 1922 reads as follows:

Sec. 304. (a) That every article imported into the United States, which is capable of being marked, stamped, branded, or labeled, without injury, at the time of its manufacture or production, shall be marked, stamped, branded, or labeled, in legible English words, in a conspicuous place that shall not be covered or obscured by any subsequent attachments or arrangements, so as to indicate the country of origin. Said marking, stamping, branding, or labeling shall be-as nearly indelible and permanent as the nature of the article will…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bradford Co. v. American Lithographic Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  2. United States v. MartorelliCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  3. Hobe Button Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. American Sponge & Chamois Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. Hudson Forwarding & Shipping Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. H. L. Gwalter & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
  4. Gray & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  5. United States v. American Sponge & Chamois Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API