Legal Opinion

Di Martino v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 17, 1926No. 2718PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hatpield, Judge,

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court:

Figs packed in small baskets were imported in wooden cases containing fifty baskets each. Neither the cases nor the baskets at the time of importation were marked to indicate the country of origin. They were required to be marked under customs supervision. Thereupon the collector assessed the merchandise with the additional duty of 10 per centum of its appraised value.

The importer protested that the articles of importation were figs, and not baskets of figs, and, as the figs were not capable of being marked, stamped, branded, or labeled…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. MartorelliCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. American Sponge & Chamois Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. United States v. American Sponge & Chamois Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. Zaloom v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API