Sussman v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge
Sanitary napkins imported at the port of New York were held not legally marked by the collector of customs and were accordingly assessed by him with an additional duty of 10 per centum on the appraised value under that part of section 304 of the Tariff Act of 1922 which reads as follows:
Sec. 304. (a) That every article imported into the United States, which is capable of being marked, stamped, branded, or labeled, without injury, at the time of its manufacture or production, shall be marked, stamped, branded, or labeled, in legible English words, in a conspicuous place that shall not be…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bradford Co. v. American Lithographic Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- United States v. MartorelliCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- Hobe Button Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. R. Hillier's Son Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- United States v. American Sponge & Chamois Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- United States v. Milnor, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
- Gray & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- United States v. American Sponge & Chamois Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.