Legal Opinion

Burstein & Sussman v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 11, 1928No. 3032PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHateield, Judge

This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States Customs Court overruling a protest against the ■ assessment • of an additional duty of 10 per centum ad valorem under the provisions of section 304 (a) of the Tariff Act of 1922, which reads as follows:

Sec. 304. (a) That every article imported into the United States, which is capable of being marked, stamped, branded, or labeled, without injury, at the time of its manufacture or production, shall be marked, stamped, .branded, or labeled, in legible English words, in a conspicuous place that shall not be covered or obscured by any…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Stone & Downer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Bradford Co. v. American Lithographic Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  3. United States v. MartorelliCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  4. Hobe Button Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  5. United States v. Stone & Downer Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Mercantil Distribuidora, S. A.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  2. Hurricane Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  3. Judson-Sheldon Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  4. Lamont v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  5. Protest 806582-G/84226 of Rosenbaum Bros.United States Customs Court · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API