Dollar-A-Day Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc. v. Pacific Telephone & Telegragh Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ALLPORT, J.
Plaintiffs appeal from orders sustaining a demurrer without leave to amend to their complaint and dismissing this action as to defendant Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company. a cor poration, hereinafter referred to as “Pacific.” This appeal lies from, the order of dismissal. (Code Civ. Proc., § § 581, subd. 3, 58Id., 904.1, subd. (a).) By their complaint plaintiffs seek injunctive relief and, damages against Pacific based upon allegations of unreasonable, arbitrary and discrimina,tor)' practices in regulation of plaintiffs’ display advertising in the yellow pages of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Loustalot v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Wilson v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Pratt v. Coast Trucking, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964
- Vila v. Tahoe Southside Water UtilityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Weiss v. MarcusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Behrend v. Bell Telephone Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Timberidge Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Santa RosaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Colich & Sons v. Pacific BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Trammell v. Western Union Telegraph Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.